Sri Lanka’s CB governor not guilty : Bond Investigation Report

Apr 19, 2015 (LBO) – The committee appointed by Prime Minister to probe the controversial 30 year bond has found that Central Bank governor Arjuna Mahendran had no direct participation in the incident, a statement issued by the Economic Affairs Ministry said. "The Committee concluded that there was no evidence to the effect that the governor had direct participation with regard to the activities of the Public Debt Department and the Tender Board Committee.
buy orlistat online buy orlistat online no prescription
" the statement said. However, the Committee has noted serious lapses on the part of the Bank of Ceylon through whom Perpetual Treasuries had routed an unusually large amount of bids for the 30 year bond. “The Committee observed that the bidding pattern of Perpetual Treasuries was unusual and warranted a further investigation.” the statement further said. The full text of the statement issued by the Economic Affairs Ministry is reproduced below. Press release issued by the Ministry of Policy Planning and Economic Affairs The committee of eminent lawyers which inquired into the 30-year Treasury Bond issuance has made far reaching recommendations to ensure transparency and better governance at the Central Bank. The three-member Committee had interviewed a large number of individuals, including the governor, officials from the Central Bank, primary dealers and Perpetual Treasuries. Several deficiencies in the bank's Public Debt Department (PDD) which handles all matters relating to servicing the domestic and foreign debt of the government of Sri Lanka was observed by the Committee. "Since the PDD is dealing with the most sensitive information of the government, the committee is of the opinion that a proper supervisory and monitoring mechanism has to be immediately implemented with regard to its activities," the committee said in its 19-page report. However, the committee found that Governor Arjuna Mahendran had no direct role in deciding to accept bids over and above the one billion rupees stipulated in the 30-year bond tender and accept up to 10 billion rupees. The PDD had projected the government’s funding requirement as at 2nd March 2015 at 13.55 billion rupees. "Even though the minutes of the Monetary Board number 4/2015 specifies to issue a 30-year treasury bond, the amount of the bond has not been decided by the Monetary Board (of which the governor is the chairman).
buy amitriptyline online buy amitriptyline online no prescription
"This exercise is vested with the PDD as per the Operational Manual of the PDD. The decision to accept the excess amount has been taken by the Tender Board Committee that comprises eight members. "The governor of Central Bank of Sri Lanka is not a member of the Tender Board Committee." The Committee concluded that there was no evidence to the effect that the governor had direct participation with regard to the activities of the PDD and the Tender Board Committee. However, the Committee noted serious lapses on the part of the Bank of Ceylon (BOC) through whom Perpetual Treasuries had routed an unusually large amount of bids for the 30-year bond. The Committee observed that the bidding pattern of Perpetual Treasuries was unusual and warranted a further investigation. It noted that the Bank of Ceylon should also carry out a forensic audit and seek explanations from its Chief Dealer and others on ad-hoc decisions risking a large amount of BOC funds involved in the 30-year bond transaction. The three-member Committee that looked into the 30-year bond issue consisted: Gamini Pitipana (Attorney-At-Law) - Chairman Mahesh Kalugampitiya (Attorney-At-Law) - Committee Member Chandimal Mendis (Attorney-At-Law) - Committee Member 19th April 2015
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Sukumala
Sukumala
9 years ago

Of course this committee may have a bias but I don’t think Arjuna Mahendran had any direct involvement in the bond issue.

Dillon
Dillon
9 years ago

Well if Mahendran is not guilty i think he should be re instated as the Central Bank Governor…. But the lurking question how on earth his Son in Law got most of the tenders May he should be summoned and questioned regarding the Matter.

Top
2
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x